Except windows isn't any more or less defective than OS X. Both of you keep bypassing that fact. If you don't believe the initial premise that both OS's are defective, than there is no more reason to continue the rest of the discussion. I base my opinion on security experts, I'm also not in any way saying that out in the world you are in danger of trojans or viruses if you run OSX. OS X is never shown to be defective (except in all the security updates released for it) because their footprint is so small there is no reason for those after money to go after OSX. If the main reason for trojans/viruses these days is to gain control of as many systems as possible, no enterprising black hat would even look at OS X. But, you put OS X on a level playing field with windows and linux, and tell your white hat security experts, take down *any* of the three first and you get some cool cash...and OS X is taken down first for several years with ease that clearly shows defective issues in the OS. On top of that, the security guys go on to say they went after OS X because it was the easiest of three.
So the real question is, if two companies release a defective product...but only one is used so much that it SHOWS it's defective nature...are they both defective or just the one? On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 7:29 PM, John Duncan Yoyo <[email protected]>wrote: > On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 8:56 PM, mike <[email protected]> wrote: > > > As always change the subject to fit your argument, one way to always > think > > you win. > > > > Sorry but Tom caught you. That is the final conclusion of your argument if > you push it all the way. > > > > > On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 6:37 PM, t.piwowar <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > An interesting game of turn about your play here. So we should not > blame > > M$ > > > for producing a defective product, but instead we should blame the > buyer > > for > > > buying a known defective product. They are really the ones creating > this > > > mess. > > > > > > That's rich! > > > > > > > > > > > > > ************************************************************************* > > > ** List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy > ** > > > ** policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/** > > > > ************************************************************************* > > > > > > > > > ************************************************************************* > > ** List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy ** > > ** policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/ ** > > ************************************************************************* > > > > > > -- > John Duncan Yoyo > -------------------------------o) > > > ************************************************************************* > ** List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy ** > ** policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/ ** > ************************************************************************* > ************************************************************************* ** List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy ** ** policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/ ** *************************************************************************
