I have heard this schtick before Mike.
What ends up being found out is that costs are level across the
board. Where you might save in one area, you more for in another area.
But here is the kicker. The wages are also usually lower in those
low rent areas, so the net effect is less money.
I lived rurally for a number of years, and found that I paid much
more for my groceries than the people who lived in the cities. No
competition. I also found out that the utility folks could care
less. (Cable phone etc.) as we are not the paying customers.
It just gets frustrating being told well because you live there, you
deserve what happens to you.
Stewart
At 10:21 AM 1/29/2010, mike wrote:
So he shouldn't complain because you are willing to get raped? Makes sense.
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 9:08 AM, tjpa <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> If you lived in a higher rent district you would be getting connectivity of
> better quality and lower cost. But many of your other costs would
be higher.
> I bet your total cost is way lower than what many of us pay in rent,
> property taxes, etc.. You have nothing to gripe about.
Rev. Stewart A. Marshall
mailto:[email protected]
Prince of Peace www.princeofpeaceozark.org
Ozark, AL SL 82
*************************************************************************
** List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy **
** policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/ **
*************************************************************************
