In a message dated 7/13/2003 11:40:47 AM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Nothing that I see in these documents
precludes the possibility that the practice of plural marriages might be
revived if those temporal laws are someday changed.
But what evidence could the documents contain that would preclude the possibility of reviving the practice of plural marriages should temporal laws change? Such a possibility always exists. If so, the supposition that the LDS Church's official change in position "might be revised" in the future doesn't seem to have much content.
Bobby Lipkin
Widener University School of Law
Delaware
- Re: "Agenda" and persecution of Mormons Marci Hamilton
- Re: "Agenda" and persecution of Mormo... Paul Finkelman
- Re: "Agenda" and persecution of Mormo... Marci Hamilton
- Re: "Agenda" and persecution of M... Paul Finkelman
- Re: "Agenda" and persecution of Mormo... Mae Kuykendall
- Re: "Agenda" and persecution of Mormo... Robert Sheridan
- Re: "Agenda" and persecution of Mormo... Robert Justin Lipkin
- Re: "Agenda" and persecution of Mormo... Marci Hamilton
- Re: "Agenda" and persecution of Mormo... GJRussello
- Re: "Agenda" and persecution of Mormo... Robert Justin Lipkin
- Re: "Agenda" and persecution of M... Christopher Eisgruber
- Re: "Agenda" and persecution ... Nelson Lund
- Re: "Agenda" and persecut... VanL
- Re: "Agenda" and per... Nelson Lund
- Re: "Agenda" and... Christopher Eisgruber
- Re: "Agenda"... Sanford Levinson
- Re: "Agenda"... Paul Finkelman
