I
haven't studied or taught standing doctrine in any detail for a long time.
I'd be very interested in knowing what those of you who know more than I
do might think about the standing question and how the S. Ct. might resolve
it.
Dan Conkle
**************************************
Daniel O. Conkle
Professor of Law
Indiana University School of Law
Bloomington, Indiana 47405
(812) 855-4331
fax (812) 855-0555
e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
**************************************
**************************************
Daniel O. Conkle
Professor of Law
Indiana University School of Law
Bloomington, Indiana 47405
(812) 855-4331
fax (812) 855-0555
e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
**************************************
-----Original Message-----
From: Sam Bagenstos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 3:29 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Justices Take Case on Pledge of Allegiance's 'God' Reference
The only thing I'd say about this is that I wouldn't count any of the "Fab Four" as sure votes for the plaintiff on the standing question.
From: Sam Bagenstos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 3:29 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Justices Take Case on Pledge of Allegiance's 'God' Reference
The only thing I'd say about this is that I wouldn't count any of the "Fab Four" as sure votes for the plaintiff on the standing question.
