In a message dated 10/16/2003 11:21:44 AM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Am I missing something on the standing question, or is this squarely governed by Flast v. Cohen's acceptance of taxpayer standing in Establishment Clause cases whether or not Newdow's relationship with his daughter would provide grounds for the more particularized harm required outside of the EC context?
Is there reason to be concerned that the Court will turn its back on Flast v. Cohen and narrow the possibilities for standing in Establishment Clause cases?
Marci
Marci A. Hamilton
Paul R. Verkuil Chair in Public Law
Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law
Yeshiva University
- Standing Issue in Pledge of Allegiance Case Conkle, Daniel O.
- Re: Standing Issue in Pledge of Allegiance Case Eastman, John
- Re: Standing Issue in Pledge of Allegiance Case Marci Hamilton
- Re: Standing Issue in Pledge of Allegiance Case Eastman, John
- Re: Standing Issue in Pledge of Allegiance Case Earl Maltz
- Re: Standing Issue in Pledge of Allegiance Case Eastman, John
- Re: Standing Issue in Pledge of Allegiance Case Parry, John
- Re: Standing Issue in Pledge of Allegiance Case Scarberry, Mark
- Re: Standing Issue in Pledge of Allegiance Case Earl Maltz
- Re: Standing Issue in Pledge of Allegiance Case Steve Gey
- Re: Standing Issue in Pledge of Allegiance Case Ann Althouse
- Re: Standing Issue in Pledge of Allegiance Case Earl Maltz
