In a message dated 10/16/2003 11:21:44 AM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

Am I missing something on the standing question, or is this squarely governed by Flast v. Cohen's acceptance of taxpayer standing in Establishment Clause cases whether or not Newdow's relationship with his daughter would provide grounds for the more particularized harm required outside of the EC context?
 



Is there reason to be concerned that the Court will turn its back on Flast v. Cohen and narrow the possibilities for standing in Establishment Clause cases?

Marci


Marci A. Hamilton
Paul R. Verkuil Chair in Public Law
Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law
Yeshiva University

Reply via email to