Samuel Ortiz <[email protected]> writes:

> Hi Kalle,

Bonjour Samuel,

> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 01:00:18PM +0300, Kalle Valo wrote:
>> What about CONNMAN_SERVICE_SECURITY_WPA and
>> CONNMAN_SERVICE_SECURITY_RSN?
>> 
>> I haven't understood the difference between the three. 
> CONNMAN_SERVICE_SECURITY_WPA and  CONNMAN_SERVICE_SECURITY_RSN are legacy
> values, when ConnMan used to think it would be good to make a difference
> between WPA and WPA2. It eventually got merged into
> CONNMAN_SERVICE_SECURITY_PSK as we realized there is no need for ConnMan to
> know if we're doing WPA or WPA2.

Thank you for the history briefing :)

> So Patrik patch is right, and we're keeping the _RSN and _WPA values for
> legacy reasons. We probably should just get rid of them now.

Yeah, getting rid of old cruft like this is a good idea. I can do a
patch if it's not too much work.

Can I also remove it from the service api?

-- 
Kalle Valo
_______________________________________________
connman mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.connman.net/listinfo/connman

Reply via email to