Hi Kalle, On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 01:20:29PM +0300, Kalle Valo wrote: > Samuel Ortiz <[email protected]> writes: > > So Patrik patch is right, and we're keeping the _RSN and _WPA values for > > legacy reasons. We probably should just get rid of them now. > > Yeah, getting rid of old cruft like this is a good idea. I can do a > patch if it's not too much work. It shouldn't be, no.
> Can I also remove it from the service api? That would be nice, yes. Cheers, Samuel. -- Intel Open Source Technology Centre http://oss.intel.com/ _______________________________________________ connman mailing list [email protected] http://lists.connman.net/listinfo/connman
