Le mar 12/08/2003 � 18:43, Buchan Milne a �crit : > FACORAT Fabrice wrote:
> Do you know what Group Policy Objects are? That is the kind of thing > that needs to be implemented. Of course it would have no effect on > standalone machines, it would only take effect if the machine is > configured for ldap authentication. I know what group policy is for. I don't say it was bad. I just say that it is usefull only for workstation/server and not for desktop. So in order not to bloat too much msec/urpmi, you may have to sprovide a special version of this tools with LDAP support. It's silly to have have desktop PC installed with LDAP auth/.... > Or maybe you have a better way for ensuring that 20000 desktops don't > show user icons in kdm/mdkkdm, don't allow remote root login, only allow > members of wheel to su, some machines have commercial packages, some not > etc etc? > > autofs has LDAP support, and I don't see anyone complaining that we > should throw it out just in case a single user installs it by mistake? ok, so if urpmi/msec don't become too bloated, no problem at all for me. But if they are bloat and can be harder to fix when there are bugs ... no way
