Am Montag, 1. September 2003 16:48 schrieb Ben Reser: > On Sat, Aug 23, 2003 at 06:27:54PM +0200, Steffen Barszus wrote: > > That was discussed allready I think, what i wonder is that it isn't > > fixed. What about a virtual provide dm ? > > I think the requirement is for something that's kdm compatable in its > configuration. So kdm-compatable would be more accurate. Just dm > would apply to gdm which doesn't read the same config file...
Ok, so a provide virtual-kdm on both kdm and mdkkdm I guess, but i can't do something about this anyway. Steffen
