Am Samstag, 23. August 2003 17:39 schrieb Brian Tyndall: > Tried urpmi --auto-select this morning and got:- > > kdebase-3.1.3-4mdk.i586 (due to missing mdkkdm-9.1-28mdk.i586) > kdebase-nsplugins-3.1.3-4mdk.i586 (due to missing > mdkkdm-9.1-28mdk.i586) libkdebase4-nsplugins-3.1.3-4mdk.i586 (due to > missing > mdkkdm-9.1-28mdk.i586) > > IMHO this is totally out of order. mdkkdm is an _alternative_ to kdm > and some of us do not want to use it, as is our choice. Are users to > get into the habit of --allow-nodeps and the lists become full of MDK > sucks messages?
That was discussed allready I think, what i wonder is that it isn't fixed. What about a virtual provide dm ? Steffen
