Also sprach jeu, 22 jun 2000 : > Ok, thanks, but when I get into X, there seems to be a virtual desktop > active, where to see the borders of the screen, you have to move your > pointer to the edge, then the border slides over ...know how to turn this > off? Hav a look to your XF86config-4, in the screen section, and comment any "virtual" reference. The syntax is nearly the same for the config files. > ...and at highest resolution, there is a white vertical band on the > rright-hand side of the screen. Don't know > Is 4.0 supposed to be faster? It seems to take up more RAM. I'm still curious to find benchmarks about this :-) -- Guillaume Rousse Iremia - Universit� de la R�union Sleep doesn't exists. Just lack of cafeine.
- Re: [Cooker] Voodoo 3 and XF86 ... Guillaume Rousse
- Re: [Cooker] Voodoo 3 and XF86 4.0? Hoyt
- Re: [Cooker] Voodoo 3 and XF86 4.0? Serge Lussier
- Re: [Cooker] Voodoo 3 and XF86 4.0? Anton Graham
- RE: [Cooker] Voodoo 3 and XF86 4.0? bobby dowling
- RE: [Cooker] Voodoo 3 and XF86 4.0? Sebastian Dransfeld
- RE: [Cooker] Voodoo 3 and XF86 4.0? Guillaume Rousse
- RE: [Cooker] Voodoo 3 and XF86 4.0? Guillaume Rousse
- RE: [Cooker] Voodoo 3 and XF86 4.0? bobby dowling
- RE: [Cooker] Voodoo 3 and XF86 4.0? Guillaume Rousse
- RE: [Cooker] Voodoo 3 and XF86 4.0? bobby dowling
- Re: [Cooker] Voodoo 3 and XF86 4.0? bobby dowling
- Re: [Cooker] Voodoo 3 and XF86 4.0? Guillaume Cottenceau
- Re: [Cooker] Voodoo 3 and XF86 4.0? bobby dowling
- Re: [Cooker] Voodoo 3 and XF86 4.0? Guillaume Cottenceau
