On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 04:22:36PM +0200, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: > "Andrej Borsenkow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > [...] > > > Nobody says cooker is bad. But it is very strange to see that one one hand > > you (meaning "who ever adds stuff to cooker") blindly remove library that > > is needed by half of the other packages (with motto "It's Cooker") and on > > Which one? > I guess he refers to glib2-1.3.5. Some packages needs to be rebuilt. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: [Cooker] No need to test on old ... J . A . Magallon
- RE: [Cooker] No need to test on old ... Andrej Borsenkow
- Re: [Cooker] No need to test on old ... guran
- Re: [Cooker] No need to test on old ... Juan Quintela
- RE: [Cooker] No need to test on old kernel Andrej Borsenkow
- Re: [Cooker] No need to test on old kernel guran
- Re: [Cooker] No need to test on old kernel Pixel
- Re: [Cooker] No need to test on old kern... guran
- Re: [Cooker] No need to test on old kern... Blue Lizard
- Re: [Cooker] No need to test on old ... Guillaume Cottenceau
- Re: [Cooker] No need to test on old kernel David Odin
- Re: [Cooker] No need to test on old kernel Randy Kramer
- Re: [Cooker] No need to test on old kernel Guillaume Cottenceau
- Re: [Cooker] No need to test on old kernel Randy Kramer
