On 28 Jul 2001, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: > But packagers are strange animals, they tend to forget the rules :-). Yes, I have read the policy, but I have also pointed out that many of the packages still do not comply. > > > > Still, there is enough there to make the claim that they are RedHat > > compatible, but I am not sure if it warrants 100% as it says on the > > webpage. > > Yes, of course ;p. If the lib issue is the biggest issue (I don't know) it could be that after fixing it 100% is warranted. I guess that is left up to marketing anyway ;) -- Sincerely, David Walluck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- Re: [Cooker] Mdk and lack of providing real upgrades.... Eaon
- Re: [Cooker] Mdk and lack of providing real upgrades.... Harry
- Re: [Cooker] Mdk and lack of providing real upgrades.... Harry
- Re: [Cooker] Mdk and lack of providing real upgrades.... David Walluck
- Re: [Cooker] Mdk and lack of providing real upgrades.... Harry
- Re: [Cooker] Mdk and lack of providing real upgrades.... Harry
- Re: [Cooker] Mdk and lack of providing real upgrades.... Harry
- Re: [Cooker] Mdk and lack of providing real upgrades.... David Walluck
- Re: [Cooker] Mdk and lack of providing real upgrades.... Guillaume Cottenceau
- [Cooker] rpm-4.0.3-0.17 undefined symbol Roberto J.
- Re: [Cooker] Mdk and lack of providing real upgrades.... David Walluck
- Re: [Cooker] Mdk and lack of providing real upgrades.... Harry
- Re: [Cooker] Mdk and lack of providing real upgrades.... Harry
- Re: [Cooker] Mdk and lack of providing real upgrades.... Harry
- Re: [Cooker] Mdk and lack of providing real upgrades.... guran
- Re: [Cooker] Mdk and lack of providing real upgrades.... Ben Reser
- Re: [Cooker] Mdk and lack of providing real upgrades.... Harry
- Re: [Cooker] Mdk and lack of providing real upgrades.... Geoffrey Lee
- Re: [Cooker] Mdk and lack of providing real upgrades.... Ben Reser
- Re: [Cooker] Mdk and lack of providing real upgrades.... Harry
- Re: [Cooker] Mdk and lack of providing real upgrades.... Ben Reser
