Holding meetings with LEA is a good idea in order to help them understand what 
we all do as well as to understand their concerns.

Demanding that they register etc., would make such meetings problematic.

So I disagree with you fundamentally.



Mr Michele Neylon
Blacknight Solutions
Hosting, Colocation & Domains
Intl. +353 (0) 59  9183072
Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090
Personal blog:
Some thoughts: 
Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty
Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,R93 X265,Ireland  Company No.: 370845
´╗┐On 19/02/2018, 15:08, "cooperation-wg on behalf of Alexander Isavnin" 
< on behalf of> wrote:

    Seems i'v mistaken, and Openness and Transparency are no longer essencial 
values for RIPE NCC.
    No gap could be briged if LEAs stays anonymous. 
    Breaking openness and transparency for comfort of some doubtful officers - 
is really bad idea.
    Why i ask for LEA deanonymisation? 
    Read ECHR cases against Russia on tortures (and other abuses) by all kind 
of LEAs. It would be really pity, if later appears, that RIPE NCC have met some 
of such abusers.
    P.S. As we say in Internet: "pics, or never happened"
    P.P.S. Also, "Once cop always cop", even if it tries to infiltrate into 
engeneering world. As we seen, successfully protecting interests of cops, 
rather than interests of Community.
    Sent via RIPE Forum --

Reply via email to