Holding meetings with LEA is a good idea in order to help them understand what
we all do as well as to understand their concerns.
Demanding that they register etc., would make such meetings problematic.
So I disagree with you fundamentally.
Mr Michele Neylon
Hosting, Colocation & Domains
Intl. +353 (0) 59 9183072
Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090
Personal blog: https://michele.blog/
Some thoughts: https://ceo.hosting/
Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty
Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,R93 X265,Ireland Company No.: 370845
On 19/02/2018, 15:08, "cooperation-wg on behalf of Alexander Isavnin"
<cooperation-wg-boun...@ripe.net on behalf of isav...@gmail.com> wrote:
Seems i'v mistaken, and Openness and Transparency are no longer essencial
values for RIPE NCC.
No gap could be briged if LEAs stays anonymous.
Breaking openness and transparency for comfort of some doubtful officers -
is really bad idea.
Why i ask for LEA deanonymisation?
Read ECHR cases against Russia on tortures (and other abuses) by all kind
of LEAs. It would be really pity, if later appears, that RIPE NCC have met some
of such abusers.
P.S. As we say in Internet: "pics, or never happened"
P.P.S. Also, "Once cop always cop", even if it tries to infiltrate into
engeneering world. As we seen, successfully protecting interests of cops,
rather than interests of Community.
Sent via RIPE Forum -- https://www.ripe.net/participate/mail/forum