[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5023?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12663726#action_12663726
]
Steve Loughran commented on HADOOP-5023:
----------------------------------------
There are some nice aspects of Jetty which would be lost
-very easy to manage
-consistency with the rest of the codebase
-lightweight installation
I'm not expressing a preference for either, just making clear that Jetty is
very convenient a lot of the time.
> Change hdfsproxy to use Tomcat instead of Jetty
> -----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-5023
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5023
> Project: Hadoop Core
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: contrib/hdfsproxy
> Reporter: Kan Zhang
>
> We plan to change hdfsproxy to use Tomcat instead of Jetty for the following
> reasons.
> 1. The embedded feature of Jetty is not required as hdfsproxy is intended as
> a standalone server.
> 2. Tomcat has good production support at Yahoo, whereas Jetty doesn't.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
