[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5023?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12663884#action_12663884
]
Kan Zhang commented on HADOOP-5023:
-----------------------------------
> There are some nice aspects of Jetty which would be lost
I agree. If there is consensus on using Jetty for the open source version, I'm
open to it. However, since Yahoo is going to use Tomcat internally, it would be
easier if we don't have to deal with 2 containers when we add new features. On
the other hand, servlet container interfaces are fairly standardized. If we
need to switch back to Jetty in the future for some reason, it shouldn't be
hard.
> Change hdfsproxy to use Tomcat instead of Jetty
> -----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-5023
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5023
> Project: Hadoop Core
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: contrib/hdfsproxy
> Reporter: Kan Zhang
> Assignee: zhiyong zhang
>
> We plan to change hdfsproxy to use Tomcat instead of Jetty for the following
> reasons.
> 1. The embedded feature of Jetty is not required as hdfsproxy is intended as
> a standalone server.
> 2. Tomcat has good production support at Yahoo, whereas Jetty doesn't.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
