Hi Martin,
is that 6666666 a fake bug id?
I still can't see it in the public bugparade:
* This bug is not available.
More information is available at
-http://developers.sun.com/resources/bugsFAQ.html#s4q2
-Ulf
Am 11.03.2010 20:38, schrieb Martin Buchholz:
Ulf, your changes would be easier to get in
if they were organized as mq patch files that
could be qimported into an existing mq repo.
I've done that below, which includes a subset of
your own proposed changes:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~martin/webrevs/openjdk7/isSupplementaryCodePoint/
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~martin/webrevs/openjdk7/public-isBMPCodePoint/
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~martin/webrevs/openjdk7/Character-warnings/
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~martin/webrevs/openjdk7/malformed-utf8/
Sherman (or Alan),
please review and/or file bugs for the above changes.
isBMPCodePoint is a spec addition, requiring additional paperwork.
Sherman, you owe me a response to my now-moldy proposed changes to
the UTF-8 charset.
The only controversial change would be the change in behavior in
malformed-utf8, which I can take out.
Martin
