Martin Buchholz wrote:
Therefore the existing implementation
 return codePoint>= MIN_SUPPLEMENTARY_CODE_POINT
            &&  codePoint<= MAX_CODE_POINT;

will almost always perform just one comparison against a constant,
which is hard to beat.

1. Wondering: I think there are TWO comparisons.
2. Those comparisons need to load 32 bit values from machine code, against
only 8 bit values in my case.

It's a good point.  In the machine code, shifts are likely to use
immediate values, and so will be a small win.

int x = codePoint >>> 16;
return x != 0 && x < 0x11;

(On modern hardware, these optimizations
are less valuable than they used to be;
ordinary integer arithmetic is almost free)


I'm not convinced if the proposed code is really better...a "small win".

Without seeing the real native machine code generated, I'm not sure
if

0: iload_0 1: bipush 16 3: iushr 4: istore_1 5: iload_1 6: ifeq 19

is really better than

0: iload_0 1: ldc #2 // int 65536
      3: if_icmplt     16


for bmp character case, especially given the existing code has better readability and yes, shorter....

Yes, shift might be able to use the immediate values, but it still needs to handle the "operands" and it is an extra operation. The only chance the new one might be better is that the "ifeq" is faster than "if_icmplt", but have not worked on the instruction set level for too long, so I can't tell (kinda remember you have to check the "circles" of each operation to see which one is
"faster" during my old gcc compiler day)

OK, convince me:-)

-Sherman


public class Character extends java.lang.Object {
 public static final int MIN_SUPPLEMENTARY_CODE_POINT = 65536;

 public static final int MAX_CODE_POINT = 1114111;

 public Character();
   Code:
0: aload_0 1: invokespecial #1 // Method java/lang/Object."<init>":()V 4: return
 public static boolean isSupplementaryCodePoint(int);
   Code:
0: iload_0 1: ldc #2 // int 65536
      3: if_icmplt     16
6: iload_0 7: ldc #3 // int 1114111
      9: if_icmpgt     16
12: iconst_1 13: goto 17 16: iconst_0 17: ireturn
 public static boolean isSupplementaryCodePoint_new(int);
   Code:
0: iload_0 1: bipush 16 3: iushr 4: istore_1 5: iload_1 6: ifeq 19 9: iload_1 10: bipush 17
     12: if_icmpge     19
15: iconst_1 16: goto 20 19: iconst_0 20: ireturn }

Reply via email to