On Thu, 12 Jun 2025 15:29:55 GMT, Jaikiran Pai <j...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> I went back and looked at the JDK-5017871 issue through which the `fo > o.class` was being tested and from what I see in there, the current test > changes continue to test that issue. I think there might be better ways to > test that original use case and this test could be simplified a lot, but it's > certainly not for this PR. Maybe labelling this test with `@bug 4957669 5017871` was a mistake, test/jdk/java/net/Socket/IDNTest.java does address 4957669 and 5017871. ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25703#issuecomment-2971687510
