----[Please read http://ercoupers.com/disclaimer.htm before following any
advice in this forum.]----




Just because it passed annual recently does not me a whole lot. In many
cases the inspector only looks at a few things as far as the engine what
was the low cylinder and a compression check only tells you the rings,
valves and guides are good or bad and of course there are many more parts
to your engine. I recently bought a 0-200 engine that had cold compression
over 75 on all cly. and running great. I was about ready to stick it on my
coupe but decided beings it had about a 1000 hrs on it to tear it down and
rebuild it. Sent the crank, cam, case and followers of to get checked. The
cam had to be reground, some of the followers were red tagged, the case
had to have work on it and lined bored and the crank was red tagged. This
engine came off of a flying Cessna 150 for a upgrade to 150 HP. As far as
the airframe check every place possible for corrosion especially the rear
spar check that is soon to be a AD note. Check all wiring after all these
are old A/C . Check your installed equipment list and make sure all
equipment that didn't come with the bird when it was new has proper
documentation. Not trying in any way to discourage you just talking from
my own experiences.  
Dick & Nancy     [EMAIL PROTECTED]


----- Original Message ----- 
From: john jameson <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  
To: 'Coupetech' <mailto:[email protected]>  
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 1:24 PM
Subject: [COUPERS-TECH] 30 year old ceconite

----[Please read http://ercoupers.com/disclaimer.htm before following any
advice in this forum.]----


im looking at a nice inexpensive 415c coupe to buy. it has 1971 era
ceconite on the wings.  it just passed annual,  is this anything to be
concerned about?  can this fabric last a lot longer if it is in good shape
and the plane is hangared?  

the plane has 1700 hours ttae. the engine has one low cylinder.  could the
engine possibly last a little longer?  the cylinder was fine in the
previous annual and the plane was flown only 5 hours all year. i'm
thinking that if flown a little the low cylinder may come back up.  i know
i'm a hopeless optimist.  

what do you all think? jmj

==========================
To leave this forum go to: http://ercoupers.com/lists.htm






==========================

To leave this forum go to: http://ercoupers.com/lists.htm






<<attachment: winmail.dat>>

Reply via email to