At 10:35 AM 12/18/98 -0800, you wrote: >I'm puzzled about something... > >somebody mentioned doing research to figure out which brand of mogas >absorbs the least amount of water, and mentioned that he went with the >least absorbtive brand. Wouldn't a guy *want* a fuel that would absorb >water? Seems to me that a fuel that absorbs the water and then takes it up >front to be burned in the cylinders with the fuel is better than one that >leaves it pooling in the bottom of the tank.
Hey, wait a minute...isn't the test for alcohol done by putting water in a sample of the gas, shaking it up, and letting the water settle to see how much was absorbed by the alcohol? I think in that case you'd be happier if all the water settled back to the bottom. --Steve Dold, chemistry expert ---------------------------------------------------------------- Steve Dold ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://home.pacbell.net/sdold/ Say NO to useless over-quoting ----------------------------------------------------------------
<<attachment: winmail.dat>>
