On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 10:05:00PM -0600, David M . Stowell wrote: > I see so many posts on this list criticizing courier, and even Sam's > character. Let me register as someone who is running courier on my > business domain, and am quite pleased with it (granted, it's small and > simple, but it works all the same). And I find Sam's advise useful, and > if one doesn't like his character, then one can benefit from the advise > while blithely ignoring the tone. > > Just thought someone should say something positive for a change.
Seconded. I admin a few servers for small businesses and host a handful of websites, and Courier provides an all-in-one email solution for everyone. Virtual domain support, IMAP, and Webmail all rolled into one package, built and installed in under 30 minutes, with just a "configure; make; make install". Every now and then someone mentions something about these "error" messages they're getting. I explain to them how Microsoft (or whoever the culprit is, but 80% of the time it's Hotmail or MSN) refuses to follow Internet standards, give a brief, lay description of what the problem is and how easy it would be to write standards-conformant software, and leave it to the individual to guess the reasons why the company won't fix things. Finally, I encourage them to follow the Courier instructions, and report the problem to the source. It tends to work. I applaud Sam. If more people had the backbone to stand up for what is right, the Web (and the world) would be a better place. m. _______________________________________________ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
