In the immortal words of Sam Varshavchik ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > > >As a matter of abstract principle, I'm a little dubious about the idea > >of an MUA arbitrarily munging subject lines outside of the user's > >control. > > It's not arbitrary.
Sigh, a poor choice of words: I didn't mean that it was an unconsidered decision, I meant that it was beyond the control of (and nonobvious and unexpected behavior to) the end user. > It's derived entirely from the header sorting > algorithm used by IMAP THREAD (which strips away all mailing list tags, > Re:-s (fwd)-s, and similar crap from the subject line, before sorting). > ... which, again, is used for subject line sort in sqwebmail. Makes perfect sense as a sorting criteria, I agree. I'm just not following your leap to the conclusion that my MUA should non-optionally strip them out before sending mail out. > There's enough precedent to deem [foo], Re:, (fwd), and other crap as > completely content-free fluff that needs to be get rid of, before doing > anything with the subject line. You've never written an email with parentheses or brackets in the subject line? You would never expect a naive user to? To me, this seems to violate the principle of least surprise to the user. > >Also, what's the advantage of removing the bracketed text even when > >replying to mailing lists? > > The recipient can immediately tell if the reply was sent privately, or to > the list. Wouldn't visually tagging the message as list mail based on RFC2369 would be a better way of handling that question? I don't think that stripping out brackets from the subject line is necessarily useless or antisocial behavior; I just can't see any arguement for not putting it under the control of the user or at least the administrator. -n ------------------------------------------------------------<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "One of the things that has fascinated me about The Wall Street Journal editorial page is its occasional capacity to rise above the routine moral callousness of hack conservative punditry and attain a level of exquisite depravity normally reserved for villains in James Bond movies." (--Johnathan Chait) <http://blank.org/memory/>---------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
