Peter Burden wrote: > I'm reworking the code that signs multipart messages. A test confirmed that it > did sign text/plain attachments which is very wrong. > The encapsulation you suggest would, I imagine, be multipart/related but > I'd want to be sure that all likely mail clients handle this correctly. >
I think you'd want multipart/mixed. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ courier-users mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
