Sam Varshavchik <[email protected]> writes: >>> dmj.nu MX 5 mail.dmj.nu. >>> dmj.nu MX 10 collection.skandicinkasso.de. >>> dmj.nu MX 20 mail.dmj.nu. >> >> I read this too on a Webforum, but I dubt this could have an impact >> on RFC-things Is this "legal" ? > > I can't think of any reason why this isn't "legal". > > However, it's always possible to have mail2.dmj.nu that points to > the same IP address.
Of course, if a lot of people do this, the spammers will certainly figure out ways around it, like maybe looking for an MX that ultimately resolves to a different IP from the lowest-priority one. (This doesn't mean you shouldn't do it. Only that it probably won't make all your spam problems go away forever.) -- Nathan Eady Galion Public Library ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win: http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo _______________________________________________ courier-users mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
