>===== Original Message From [EMAIL PROTECTED] =====
>>>In fact it looks like there's more chances that first world
>>>workers' buying power
>>>would drop if there was a worldwide overthrow of capitalism.
>>
>>What can this statement even mean?
>
>I was answering to some dismissive speculation of Mac. So I had to enter
>speculative-mode... I'll try to make it clearer:
>The buying power of workers in a first world country is more likely to drop
after
>a global overthrow of capitalism than after a local overthrow of capitalism.
Is
>that clear enough?
>The reason is that a global overthrow of capitalism would probably diminish
>the exploitation of third world countries who currently sell their products
cheap
>on the world markets. If capitalism was overthrown in one country only, this
>probably wouldn't happen.
>If that still isn't clear to you, I can try in French.
I hope it is not as clear as it seems. Do you mean that in the fantastic
situation in which capitalism was overthrown in, say, France alone, and France
was let along that path, the French socialist government would enjoy the
brutal expoliation of the Third World in the same way the bourgeois government
does? La R�gie Renault would be equally imperialistic, bloodsucking and
oppressive as it has been up to this day? Is THAT what you think of the French
working class?
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Crashlist resources: http://website.lineone.net/~resource_base
>To change your options or unsubscribe go to:
>http://lists.wwpublish.com/mailman/listinfo/crashlist
Lic. N�stor M. Gorojovsky
Direcci�n de Estad�sticas del Sector Primario
Instituto Nacional de Estad�stica y Censos
Argentina
Tel.: (0541) 349-9728
_______________________________________________
Crashlist resources: http://website.lineone.net/~resource_base
To change your options or unsubscribe go to:
http://lists.wwpublish.com/mailman/listinfo/crashlist
