On 17 March 2011 17:47, Darshan Shaligram <scinti...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ok, after discussion on ##crawl-dev with dpeg, kilobyte and jpeg,
> we've agreed to defer branching 0.8 until kilobyte (Adam) merges the
> unicode branch. We've settled on March 31 as the cutoff for branching
> 0.8, and a (tentative) April 24 release. Considering the size of 0.8
> and the amount of work we have to stabilise and balance it, we may
> slip on the release date, but let's make the March 31 0.8 branch date
> happen for real.

So how are things going -- with the unicode branch, and elsewhere?

Has the Ashenzari debate been resolved?
How far along are the holy monsters?

Generally speaking, could someone please look over the 0.8 plan on the
wiki and re-prioritise the items that haven't been marked as
"deferred" yet?

Bug-wise, it's been pointed out that the Orc bubble issue hasn't been
fixed yet and I'm uncertain about the state of those trove bugs. There
are other bugs but, aside from crashes, these strike me as the most
pressing ones. Crawl's seen a lot of bug fixes lately, so thanks for
all the work, folks! :D

Johanna

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Create and publish websites with WebMatrix
Use the most popular FREE web apps or write code yourself; 
WebMatrix provides all the features you need to develop and 
publish your website. http://p.sf.net/sfu/ms-webmatrix-sf
_______________________________________________
Crawl-ref-discuss mailing list
Crawl-ref-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/crawl-ref-discuss

Reply via email to