Yes a very strong reason. Not all are, so making them sub-classes is a lie. In those cases where they are then multiple instantiation is the correct solution.
Rgds SdS Stephen Stead Tel +44 20 8668 3075 Mob +44 7802 755 013 E-mail <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected] LinkedIn Profile <http://uk.linkedin.com/in/steads> http://uk.linkedin.com/in/steads From: Crm-sig [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dan Matei Sent: 15 September 2014 06:37 To: martin Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Crm-sig] More subclasses for E33_Linguistic_Object ? Hi Martin On 14 September 2014 21:40, martin <[email protected]> wrote: We use to solve this with multiple instantiation (E49, E33). Note that most place names or not language specific. Few bigger places use to have language variants. See also FRBRoo 2.0, about name use practice. Yes, but why using acrobatic solutions ? There is a strong reason against making those classes subclasses of E33_Linguistic_Object ? Cheers, Dan PS. True that Paris has few language variants. But in my Transylvania there are thousends bilingual (Romanian and Hungarian) place names. Not to mention the German ones :-)
