Stephen Stead
Tel +44 20 8668 3075
Mob +44 7802 755 013
E-mail <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]
LinkedIn Profile <http://uk.linkedin.com/in/steads>
http://uk.linkedin.com/in/steads
From: Stephen Stead [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: 24 March 2015 14:52
To: 'Athina Kritsotaki'; '[email protected]'
Subject: RE: [Crm-sig] new CIDOC CRM issue
Buildings that are not carved out of bedrock are considered mobile because
experience has shown that we do indeed move them; for example
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/a3/Salem_Church_Reloca
tion.JPG/250px-Salem_Church_Relocation.JPG
Hydraulically powered dollies move a historic 19th century brick church in
Salem, Massachusetts
Stephen Stead
Tel +44 20 8668 3075
Mob +44 7802 755 013
E-mail [email protected]
LinkedIn Profile http://uk.linkedin.com/in/steads
-----Original Message-----
From: Crm-sig [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Athina
Kritsotaki
Sent: 24 March 2015 13:13
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Crm-sig] new CIDOC CRM issue
New CIDOC CRM issue
Dear all,
Immobile buildings (graves, rock cut churches, chambers and generally
immobile monuments) are defined as features since they cannot be separated
from earth and the surrounding matter. The question is should we regard all
the immobile buildings as E25 Man-made Feature? If the answer is positive,
at that case it is contrary to the examples of the Coliseum and the palace
of Knossos, which in CRM are referred as instances of E22 Man-Made Object
and E19 Physical Object respectively.
So, think about this
Regards,
Athina Kritsotaki
----------------------------
Athina Kritsotaki
Information System Laboratory
Institute of Computer Science
Foundation of Research & Technology
e-mail:[email protected]
Tel: 2810 391639
_______________________________________________
Crm-sig mailing list
<mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]
<http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig>
http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig
