mark powers wrote: > I agree that Dan's changes are a good first step. > > That next step: > 1. Putting just the names of software providers in the kcf module and > calling > ddi_modopen/ddi_modclose to get the mechanisms. > > 2. Or doing [1] for all modules in /kernel/crypto and filtering out > hardware providers. >
I'm satisfied too with the progress.. My concerns weren't meant to hold up putback, as I did see the value of the work done.. It would be good if we can capture this next steps into an RFE.. Tony
