mark powers wrote:
> I agree that Dan's changes are a good first step.
> That next step:
> 1. Putting just the names of software providers in the kcf module and
> calling
> ddi_modopen/ddi_modclose to get the mechanisms.
> 2. Or doing [1] for all modules in /kernel/crypto and filtering out
> hardware providers.
Anthony Scarpino wrote:
> I'm satisfied too with the progress.. My concerns weren't meant to hold
> up putback, as I did see the value of the work done..
> It would be good if we can capture this next steps into an RFE..
> Tony
I filed RFE 6763670 and captured this thread in the public comments.
- Dan
_________
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
