yes yes, i know. but that will break my background image. that's what i was trying to say before: the only reason i used overflow:hidden is that it somehow made the bg work (what i'm talking about visually is that the main/middle section of that vertical silver divider line).
i see now that this was the wrong way to get the image to tile; what's the right way? thanks! josh David Laakso wrote: > snak detek+0r wrote: >> <trimmed> >> >> actually, since i got to check this on ie6 today, i did notice a huge >> problem (perhaps better asked under separate cover; not sure?). the >> problem can be easily seen here: >> >> http://tinyurl.com/nd27cr >> > > IE/6 does not support min-height and is honoring height:500px; > The correction is to let content determine height. Compliant browsers, > and IE/7 will all go along with this; and, IE/6 will follow suit. > > #content { border: 1px solid red (4 position only--delete); > width:580px; > overflow:hidden; > margin: 0 0 0 190px; > min-height:500px (delete rule); > height:auto !important (delete rule); > height:500px (delete rule); > } > ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [[email protected]] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
