snak detek+0r wrote: > >> > > Oh, I understand what you're suggesting now. And yes, that doesn't > interfere with my tiling background. But it does end up with certain > pages looking a little silly: > > http://tinyurl.com/mfyyuf
Nothing "silly" about that page in my humble opinion. The page is "short" because there is not much content on it. If you want it, and other pages that may have little content, to appear deeper-- get creative and add a generic image beneath the text of same. And if you are really concerned with what is truly "silly" consider your content text is clipped on the right side of pages whose text runs deeper than that short page; and, that landing on pages whose horizontal and vertical navigation is larger or more important than the primary content text that is set as "mousetype" is a real PITA. > > ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
