snak detek+0r wrote:
>
>>
>> Nothing "silly" about that page in my humble opinion. The page is
>> "short" because there is not much content on it. If you want it, and
>> other pages that may have little content, to appear deeper-- get
>> creative and add a generic image beneath the text of same.
>>
>
> sigh. Adding unneeded images? That's certainly not very semantic.
Hmm. On the short page, add a class to the last line with a padding
bottom on it to drive the footer down, something like: p.last
{padding-bottom: whatever px;}
>
> Thanks for the heads up on the right margin problem, too. Actually
> trasnfered this to the 'live server' before noticing that, but I'll
> have you know that I did finally catch and fix this problem several
> days ago....
Good :-) !
>
> And thanks for the earlier (still continuing) lesson on font scaling.
Typography is not a rocket science. It is about making content readable.
Nothing more.
>
> josh
>
~d
______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
