Micky Hulse composed on 2015-12-30 10:38 (UTC-0800): > I've been a member of both lists for a long time. When the wd-l list > was active, I don't remember seeing "just use bootstrap" as a reply. > While the participation has been down for the last couple of years > (just like CSS-d), the wd-l list has been a pretty awesome place to > discuss things (in past years that is). I think there's a lot of > people on css-d that are also members of wd-l.
+1 > Also, if we consolidated (not sure of logistics involved) then all the > people here would be there (or, a hybrid list in-between), and you > would get the best of both worlds. > :) I don't share your best of both opinion. I like the tight focus here. There's good when a hybrid solution is OK. Here's better when interested in a purely CSS approach. -- "The wise are known for their understanding, and pleasant words are persuasive." Proverbs 16:21 (New Living Translation) Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 ** a11y rocks! Felix Miata *** http://fm.no-ip.com/ ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
