Hi Chris, Steve and el. is correct. There was a previously pending release currently in SourceForge (called 2.6) scheduled some time ago. Our plan is to make a clean break from SourceForge after this release to avoid any duplicate effort as you suggested. And going forward we anticipate that all work should be done from the Apache SVN. We didn't document the actual plan yet on the proposal as to how the actual migration would occur thinking that it would be part of the incubation process. Hope it clarifies things.
Thanks again. --Pei -----Original Message----- From: Mattmann, Chris A (388J) [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, July 20, 2012 2:48 PM To: <[email protected]> Subject: Re: SVN source structure for Apache cTAKES? Hi Pei, On Jul 20, 2012, at 10:59 AM, Chen, Pei wrote: > Sounds good. We'll start this over the next several weeks (after the current > cTAKES 2.6 release). Can you shed some light here? What current release are you talking about? I would encourage you not to duplicate development especially while you now have a project at the ASF incubator called Apache cTakes (incubating). Moreover, releasing software at the external, pre-Apache community can potentially cause confusion (and maintenance woes) downstream especially for Apache cTAKES and can cause folks to just not come here or avoid coming here at all from a user and developer perspective. I'd really as a mentor like to know more about what's going on here, so hopefully you (or someone else involved) can shed some light. Cheers, Chris ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. Senior Computer Scientist NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246 Email: [email protected] WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
