I can head up #4 (Build and create a 2.6 release with the existing 
codebase/structure)

-- James Masanz

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ctakes-dev-return-151-
> [email protected] [mailto:ctakes-dev-return-
> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Chen,
> Pei
> Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2012 6:09 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: SVN source structure for Apache cTAKES?
> 
> Hey Folks,
> Was at a conference with limited access today and tomorrow...
> 
> But a few updates:
> 1) branches/trunk/tags directories have been created in Apache cTAKES's
> SVN repo (Done)
> 2) The latest branch from SF (SHARPn-cTAKES) which was slated for the 2.6
> release has been added to branches (Done)
> 3) TODO: Build and create a 2.6 release with the existing codebase/structure?
> Any volunteers...?
> 4) Also added the maven-sandbox branch which we can reuse the pom's.
> (Done)
> 5) svndump of current entire ohnlp repo (In progress- seems to be >6GB and
> may take some time).  Any suggestions where to persist this dump file?
> Somewhere on ASF's SVN?
> 6) I would suggest we can use the SHARPn-cTAKES branch and maven-
> sandbox to begin working on what the new Apache cTAKES code/package
> will look like in /trunk..
> 7) All known developers from SF  have already been invited to join this
> mailing list and Apache cTAKES groups...
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Coarr, Matt [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2012 11:09 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: SVN source structure for Apache cTAKES?
> 
> Yes, https://ohnlp.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/ohnlp/branches/SHARPn-
> cTAKES/
> 
> From: Jörn Kottmann
> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
> Reply-To: "[email protected]<mailto:ctakes-
> [email protected]>" <ctakes-
> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
> Date: Tuesday, July 24, 2012 10:59 AM
> To: "[email protected]<mailto:ctakes-
> [email protected]>" <ctakes-
> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
> Subject: Re: SVN source structure for Apache cTAKES?
> 
>  it quite useful to once in a while
> look back a bit further if there is an issue.
> 
> Do you use subversion over at SF?
> 
> Jörn

Reply via email to