-Caveat Lector-
On Sun, 14 Feb 1999, Alamaine Ratliff wrote:
>Exactly!!! But I wonder *WHY* it would be necessary to consider changing
>one's appearance in the process of justifying one's actions (past, present,
>future).
First off, people, women especially, OFTEN change their appearance just
for a change...nothing 'ominous' about it, no 'hidden agendas'...
But I suspect all the negative comments from Liberals about how she
looked, being portrayed on SNL by John Goodman, of all people, probably
gave her impetus for a makeover...
Perhaps she read the comments on this list from you, Prudy, and the rest
of you Klintonistas about Paula Jones and her supposed nose job...again,
you people prove my point that for all your rhetoric regarding women's
rights, all you value is how a woman looks...
>This also became a BIG issue with Martia Clark at the beginning
^^^^^^
Why do you continue to spell her name that way?
>of the Orenthal trial.
Another woman whom instead of being assessed on her ABILITY (or lack
thereof), was constantly commented on regarding her hairstyle and
dress...
>Dressed" list. Then there's the Jones person who decided the best thing to
>do was to adjust her nose ... was Jones keeping up with the Carpenter
>MacMillans?
Perhaps she was tired of hearing all the 'big nose' jokes from the likes
of you...
Who CARES whether she had a nose job or not? Whether she spent money on
cosmetic surgery, a vacation condo in Cancun, or invested the funds on
Wall Street, has NOTHING to do with the validity or lack of validity of
her legal issues...
June
=======================================================================
"To love another person is to see the face of God."
-Les Miserables
=======================================================================
*-----------------------------------------------------------------------*
revcoal AT connix DOT com
*-----------------------------------------------------------------------*
It is UNLAWFUL to send unsolicited commercial email to this email
address per United States Code Title 47 Sec. 227. I assess a fee of
$500.00 US currency for reading and deleting such unsolicited commercial
email. Sending such email to this address denotes acceptance of these
terms. My posting messages to Usenet neither grants consent to receive
unsolicited commercial email nor is intended to solicit commercial
email.
*========================================================================*
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance�not soapboxing! These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
