-Caveat Lector-
On Fri, 18 Dec 1998, Linda Minor wrote:
>get a law passed. If you can't control the president any other way, you
>select someone to set him up (like Monica, with her sexually obsessive
>background and ties to wealthy families like Peter Straus), then get her a
>job as an unpaid intern. She flirts, smiles, wiggles, and does all the
>things Bill is known to respond to. When he repeatedly says no to her, she
It was fine up until the last bit (altho I'd argue whether Lewinsky was
part of a deliberate setup)...
But to suggest that Clinton 'repeatedly' said no to Lewinsky is the most
hilarious thing I've heard from you Clintonistas...especially since both
he and Lewinsky verify the fact that it didn't take much more than
Lewinsky batting her eyelashes to get Clinton to go down on her...
There is NOTHING in Clinton's own decidedly flawed testimony where he
implies that Lewinsky had to work very hard to get him interested in an
illicit relationship with her...
>Goldberg and Linda Tripp to send Monica back to make more enticements. At
>the same time they were bribing Paula Jones and actually putting up the
>money to keep her lawsuit going alleging harrassment, when her reputation in
>sexual matters was equally as seedy as Monica's.
Again, I'd argue that either Ms. Jones or Ms. Lewinsky had 'seedy'
reputations (except amongst you Clintonistas, who endeavor at all costs
to besmirch their reputations -- a real shame in the case of Ms.
Lewinsky, who seems to actually be in love with Bubba)...
But since even prostitutes can be victims of rape, your argument is
meaningless anyways...
>Anyone who refuses to see that this was a set up is no different than the
>people who followed Hitler blindly into the holocaust.
No, it's you Clintonistas who are slavishly devoted to a charismatic
leader who is leading you ultimately to doom and destruction...if not
quite on the level of Hitler, then definitely in a class like Jim Jones,
or Heaven's Gate...
>It's easy to create
>a law and then focus on its technicalities. That's why we no longer have
>justice under the American system of jurisprudence. The big picture of the
>Constitution, due process, fundamental fairness have been removed.
Uh, let's see...when two original articles of the Constitution are
followed strictly to the letter, you interpret that as being unfair?
I suppose throwing the Constitution out the window, and doing something
unconstitutional, like censure, WOULD be considered fair by you?
Or perhaps not doing anything at all, allowing Clinton to get away with
perjury, while any regular citizen committing perjury would find the full
weight of the jurisprudence system crashing down on their heads -- such a
double standard would be 'fair' to you?
June
! _ _ _ _ _ _` _ _ _ _ _ |_ . _ _ _ |
-~*~- _/_)(/_(_|/_)(_)| )/_) (_|| (/_(/_ | || )(_|/_) o
/!\ _| _|
/%;@\
o/@,%\o
/%;`@,\
o/@'%',\o
'^^^M^^^`
www.xs4all.nl/~klr
*-----------------------------------------------------------------------*
revcoal AT connix DOT com
*-----------------------------------------------------------------------*
It is UNLAWFUL to send unsolicited commercial email to this email
address per United States Code Title 47 Sec. 227. I assess a fee of
$500.00 US currency for reading and deleting such unsolicited commercial
email. Sending such email to this address denotes acceptance of these
terms. My posting messages to Usenet neither grants consent to receive
unsolicited commercial email nor is intended to solicit commercial
email.
*========================================================================*
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance�not soapboxing! These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
