-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 99-12-02 15:01:39 EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>What makes the nonviolent anti-WTO movement "legitimate" and the violent
>movement not? Was the Boston Tea Party not violent? Did that make it a
>bad thing? More to the point, what makes police violence legitimate and
>citizen violence not legitimate?
A local news item on the battle in Seattle pointedly referred to even the
strategy of NON-violent "civil disobedience" as a "SO-CALLED 'legitimate'
tactic."
We've come a long way, baby, from the '60s -- BACKWARDS to the '50s,
apparently ...
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing! These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
