Thanks for the correction. *R. Levitt*
On Aug 13, 2010, at 09:49 AM, Rex Nelson wrote: > The Register is not perfect either. > > Currently (8-13-2010) they have a statement at the bottom of the article > stating the following: > >> This article was updated to remove erroneous information concerning Mac OS >> X. The OS is not vulnerable to the crimeware kit. > > Rex > >> OMG! OMG! Teh Intarwebs are INFESTED!!! "I suggest we all stop using >> the Internet to be safe. An overreaction? Yes, obviously, but this >> actually sounds like a nasty bit of malware." >> >> Umm, OK, uuber-dude, but then how will we read your post to know if it's >> safe to go back online again? >> >> By the way, Scott, the article is not only stupid FUD, it's dead wrong. >> >> It Ain't Only Windows. Yup, that is correct. From The Register (who is >> not nearly as bad at FUD): "The vast majority were Windows boxes, but >> 4,000 Mac machines were also hit." >> >> Yes, you read that right. 4,000 MAC MACHINES. Guess which OS, Scott??? >> >> Theresa >> > > -- > Rex Nelson Ph.D. > Ames,IA > [email protected] > (515) 294-1297 > ~~~_/) ~~~ > > -- > Central West End Linux Users Group (via Google Groups) > Main page: http://www.cwelug.org > To post: [email protected] > To subscribe: [email protected] > To unsubscribe: [email protected] > More options: http://groups.google.com/group/cwelug -- Central West End Linux Users Group (via Google Groups) Main page: http://www.cwelug.org To post: [email protected] To subscribe: [email protected] To unsubscribe: [email protected] More options: http://groups.google.com/group/cwelug
