From: Neil Francis, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>The 'somebody' who published it is non other than - you're ahead of me
>- Neil Francis.
>
>Why so bashful?
Because some of the emails were instigated by me does not necessarily mean
I published the site. Did you check who owns the domain? Assumptions like
these get people into trouble fairly often if not careful.
>I don't get what his beef with the associations is anyway. How the absence
>of links to other shooting orgs *must* be indicative of anything sinister
>beats me.
You think so? You think the squirming and wriggling of UKPSA and NRA et al
to positively avoid linking to other UK orgs is innocent?. A five minute
job to do this - significantly more time and effort to think up excuses not
to. And you have to admit - some excuses were classics. You may like to map
the very simple and tangible question asked here so more complex and
important ones in your own time.
>not the least being if it p***** off NF... which is probably
>sufficient reason in itself :)
Hmm - delusions of grandeur on this scale I certainly do not have.
>I rather suspect that the 'fight is within' is more relevant to the apathy
>of many shooters (not readers of CS of course) rather than relationships
>between the associations.
Shooting Associations are not supposed to be some untouchable and
unaccountable body existing in another dimention of space and time. They
are supposed to belong to their members. I know BASC and NRA like to run
themselves as if their membership does not matter but that isn't supposed
to be how it works. Well done - maybe you _have_ seen the point of
talesofwoe.org.uk.
So here is a question for you as in an individual (shooter?). Do you think
the link matrix between UK shooting organizations should be complete?
-----------------
Neil Francis
Trowbridge, UK
-----------------
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-------[Cybershooters contacts]--------
Editor: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Website & subscription info: www.cybershooters.org
