> On Oct 14, 2016, at 2:13 PM, Razer <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> On 10/14/2016 10:09 AM, Shawn K. Quinn wrote: >> Reposting email clearly intended to be private > > > Spam mail is intended to be private too. So I shouldn't pass that info > on to a sysadmin or other person who might be spammed due to, let's say, > hijacked address book? > > IOW You ARE NOT MAKING A VALID POINT! > > I did not request the emails, I did not originate the conversations at > any point. I attempted to SEVERELY DISSUADE THE PERSON from sending > them. Suicide threats from someone I don't know? > > Fuck that. Go kill yourself. There are people trying desperately to live > and dying for no good reason and I'm going to worry about unsolicited > suicide notes from someone I don't even know? > > Maybe I should feel sorry for that esquire from Nigeria who wants to > deposit money in my bank account because he's being hounded by his > government too? > > Your idea of "Private" is perverse and dysfunctional. "She" ('her' > recent spew before subsiding was very masculine in nature) has been > sending this garbage to a few other UNWILLING RECIPIENTS whose emails
None of these other UNWILLING RECIPIENTS has seen fit to broadcast a private message over and over. > she only knows because this list is so fucking unsecured it passes your So "unsecured" ? How do you suggest the list be "secured"? John > email on to... whomever. Spam email harvesters etc. > > I've violated NO ONE'S privacy. > > Hugs and kisses... I'd like to be in your lap right now... > > Crap. > > Rr >
