On 10/14/2016 10:22 AM, xorc...@sigaint.org wrote: >> >> Fishing for an age... Wrong. Don't bother trying again. >> > > Not two minutes before you sent the above quoted message, you posted a > message saying your reply would be the last in thread. Obviously not. > > But whatever. Uhm -- No, not fishing at all. Maybe you are a senile > 71-yro after all? Because your memory is obviously garbage. > > In our first interaction on this list you made a ridiculous claim that you > were being profiled by the government. In your words, paraphrased, since > before they were really using computers, when things were being done with > paper and punch cards. > > As I pointed out in a private message to you, which you also then posted > publicly here, punch cards were phased out in the 1960s. > > If you were a well-connected extremely rabid 20-year-old radical in 1965, > to make the fed's watch-list at that tender age, today you would be 71 > years old. > > I don't care how old you are. It's just an observation based on the > stupid, paranoid, ridiculous shit that you constantly say. And I'll tell > you WHY I don't care, in the slightest, about you or any personal details > about you: > > You're an unimportant, clueless child, with a penchant for paranoia, and > grandiose claims. You're rude, wear the term "asshole" like a badge of > honor. This alone limits any effect, or importance you could possibly have > to anyone, in any possible universe or social circle here on earth. You're > nothing, and the few morsels of information or opinion that you offer that > are worth anything, are really just pre-chewed pieces of fat gleaned from > other sources. At best, you're the net equivalent of a talking head, > dutifully reading off the page presented to you from somewhere else, > trying to convince us that it has merit. > > You have never had an original thought in your short little life, and > since you obviously feed your ego mostly through the goings-on here - the > net equivalent of scrawling graffiti in a dis-used lavatory at a random > highway rest stop, it is quite likely that you never will have such a > thought. > > You have proudly written about how you avoid IT work, preferring other > forms of labor out of some ideological duty -- which may be at least > partly true, but it is just as likely, given the observations above, that > you're just scared shitless to actually put your talents and mind to the > test, because deep down, you wonder if you have what it takes. > > That's just my opinion, off the top of my head, from what I remember of > your nonsense. > > It would be dizzingly pathetic, if it weren't so clockwork-regular like a > fucking automaton.
That sound about right. Thanks, bro :)