On 10/14/2016 11:51 AM, Shawn K. Quinn wrote: > On Fri, 2016-10-14 at 11:46 -0600, Mirimir wrote: >> On 10/14/2016 11:09 AM, Shawn K. Quinn wrote: >>> No moderator worth his/her salt would ever have approved your posting. >>> Something to think about. >>> >>> Reposting email clearly intended to be private is often in poor taste, >>> even if technically legal. Especially if it is explicit in nature, as >>> this one was. >> >> Well, except that this is a totally unmoderated list. Which is a good >> thing, I believe. So it's all on Razer. > > My points with that statement about a moderator were: > 1. The original should never have been posted. > 2. An unmoderated list means the participants themselves are supposed to > moderate their postings, and because posts like the original are making > it on to the list anyway, clearly this is failing.
Clearly. > Can we agree that there's crap that never should make it on to the list > to begin with, such as the explicit garbage clearly never intended for > public consumption which I was originally replying to? Those are my values.
