* Jason Dagit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [081114 23:14]: > On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 8:28 AM, Eric Kow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In all other cases, I'd be fine with the message and probably > automatically hit 'y'. It's just the case where I know I'm going to > hit now that I would stop to think. Assuming others operate like me, > I think this change will be fine as an 'unconditional nag'. I > seriously doubt people use --edit-description when running darcs from > a script. For this reason, we probably don't need a way to disable > the question, or do we?
I think we do and I think my amended patch, which superseeds this one is a reasonable way. Thanks for your valuable input! Kind regards, Christian -- You may use my gpg key for replies: pub 1024D/47F79788 2005/02/02 Christian Kellermann (C-Keen)
pgp9ZemGFhGhT.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
