Thanks a lot for your help. I'll have a look at darktable-chart. Anyway in the meantime I noticed that changing the "input color profile" to "standard color matrix" changes the blue colors to be much closer to the camera jpg. For now that solves my problem.
Best regards Thomas On 22.10.2017 11:40, Roman Lebedev wrote: > On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 12:27 PM, Thomas Werzmirzowsky <[email protected]> > wrote: >> Hello everybody, >> >> I shot a portrait with my Canon EOS 60D and noticed that the JPG from >> the Canon in portrait image mode looks significantly better than the one >> exported from Darktable. Especially the blue color looks much more >> natural in the camera JPG. So I tried to simulate the same result using >> the Darktable modules but I couldn't achieve it. According to Darktable >> the blue colors might be out of gamut. Could that cause the problems? >> But anyway the camera can convert it to good looking blue colors. >> >> Ideally I would have a Darktable style that would (at least in most >> cases) be quite close to the camera JPG. Can this be achieved and if so, >> how? > http://www.darktable.org/2016/05/colour-manipulation-with-the-colour-checker-lut-module/ > > Spoiler alert: trying to match out-of-camera jpeg is a fruitless road > to insanity. > Either be happy with OOC JPEG, or forget that cameras can produce them, > and edit raws till you like the result. > >> You can find the RAW and JPG files here: >> https://www.dropbox.com/s/77lg2nn9yrd2kpp/image.zip?dl=0 >> >> Any help would be highly appreciated. >> >> Best regars >> Thomas > Roman. > >> ____________________________________________________________________________ >> darktable user mailing list >> to unsubscribe send a mail to [email protected] >> ____________________________________________________________________________ darktable user mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to [email protected]
