Hi Thomas, I used Wolf Faust R1 just because I already had it to calibrate my scanner but if I were too get another one for my camera I would get the C1; its 3 times the cost of the R1 at 30 euro but its bigger (A4) and non-glossy so it's easier to get a good shot. I have had disappointing results with custom ICC profiles maybe in part because of the scanner target, but the darktable-chart styles that I created with it in different lighting situations have all had near identical positive results. Over all I agree with Jo about darktable-chart.
Tim. On Monday, 23 October 2017 09:10:26 BST Thomas Werzmirzowsky wrote: > > Gesendet: Montag, 23. Oktober 2017 um 07:47 Uhr > > Von: "Robert William Hutton" <[email protected]> > > An: [email protected] > > Betreff: Re: [darktable-user] Exported JPG vs. Camera JPG > > > > On 22/10/17 20:27, Thomas Werzmirzowsky wrote: > > > I shot a portrait with my Canon EOS 60D and noticed that the JPG from > > > the Canon in portrait image mode looks significantly better than the one > > > exported from Darktable. Especially the blue color looks much more > > > natural in the camera JPG. > > > > I have a 60D and a 5d mark iii. I can vouch for the fact that the > > "enhanced colour matrix" that is the default does a poor job with the 60D > > raws (generally much better with the 5d3 raws), mostly with the blues. > > Yes that's what I noticed too. If I switch to "standard colour matrix" the > results are much better. > > I found creating my own matrix from a Wolf Faust target worked really > > well, > > Tim Rolph also mentioned the Wolf Faust target but I have to admit that > looking at the website I don't know what to order. What "Order #" would be > the right one? > > but ultimately decided that having the additional dependency of having > > that profile present if I wanted to re-edit the images at a later date > > wasn't worth it, and I do much as you do: use the standard profile. > > Sometimes also setting the gamut clipping to linear rec2020 is a good > > option as well. > I don't really get that. Don't you have to create the profile just once and > then it's done? As the color mapping should contain all colours it > shouldn't change from photo shot to phot phot, should it? Or would it be > needed to create a new matrix for every photo shot just like doing a gray > card shot for the white balance? > > I can probably dig up the 60D profile if you'd like to try it. > > It would be great if you could lookup the profile. I'd like to give it a > try. > > Regards, > > > > Rob > > Thanks a lot. Also @Tim Rolph. > > Best regards > Thomas > ____________________________________________________________________________ > darktable user mailing list > to unsubscribe send a mail to [email protected] ____________________________________________________________________________ darktable user mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to [email protected]
