> Gesendet: Montag, 23. Oktober 2017 um 07:47 Uhr > Von: "Robert William Hutton" <[email protected]> > An: [email protected] > Betreff: Re: [darktable-user] Exported JPG vs. Camera JPG > On 22/10/17 20:27, Thomas Werzmirzowsky wrote: > > I shot a portrait with my Canon EOS 60D and noticed that the JPG from > > the Canon in portrait image mode looks significantly better than the one > > exported from Darktable. Especially the blue color looks much more > > natural in the camera JPG. > > I have a 60D and a 5d mark iii. I can vouch for the fact that the "enhanced > colour matrix" that is > the default does a poor job with the 60D raws (generally much better with the > 5d3 raws), mostly with > the blues.
Yes that's what I noticed too. If I switch to "standard colour matrix" the results are much better. > I found creating my own matrix from a Wolf Faust target worked really well, Tim Rolph also mentioned the Wolf Faust target but I have to admit that looking at the website I don't know what to order. What "Order #" would be the right one? > but ultimately decided that having the additional dependency of having that > profile present if I wanted > to re-edit the images at a later date wasn't worth it, and I do much as you > do: use the standard > profile. Sometimes also setting the gamut clipping to linear rec2020 is a > good option as well. I don't really get that. Don't you have to create the profile just once and then it's done? As the color mapping should contain all colours it shouldn't change from photo shot to phot phot, should it? Or would it be needed to create a new matrix for every photo shot just like doing a gray card shot for the white balance? > I can probably dig up the 60D profile if you'd like to try it. It would be great if you could lookup the profile. I'd like to give it a try. > Regards, > > Rob Thanks a lot. Also @Tim Rolph. Best regards Thomas ____________________________________________________________________________ darktable user mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to [email protected]
