* jeremy rosen <[email protected]> [05-13-13 06:24]: > > I don't see a reason for the order of the modules to be inverted; if one > > wants to ensure users know the order of the application of modules, they > > can be arranged in the same order in which they are applied, instead of the > > other way around. > > > > > they are... > > they are arranged bottom to top, in the order they are applied.
[...] > so, IIUC after this discussion, your suggestion is now to arrange modules > in the order they are applied top to bottom instead of bottom to top... > > At this point I don't disagree with the feature request per-se, but I don't > think it's worth the UI breakage. You are more or less the first person I > see complaining about that, so I assume people get used to it quickly/don't > mind. I to work "top to bottom" and would appreciate seeing the modules presented as I would access them, top to bottom, rather than as a time-line with the last applied at the top. We *are* discussing *only* the "favorites" folder? The stack is properly, or as expected, with last applied at top of the stack. -- (paka)Patrick Shanahan Plainfield, Indiana, USA HOG # US1244711 http://wahoo.no-ip.org Photo Album: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/gallery2 http://en.opensuse.org openSUSE Community Member Registered Linux User #207535 @ http://linuxcounter.net ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book "Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and their applications. This 200-page book is written by three acclaimed leaders in the field. The early access version is available now. Download your free book today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/neotech_d2d_may _______________________________________________ Darktable-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/darktable-users
